Mad that only 2 of these players were part of winning teams. Does the fantasy scoring need to be updated to reflect performances / difference makers that lead to success?
Think it could be an oddity of this week in particular (think last week 10/15 were on the winning side). But it will be interesting to see how it progresses.
It would be a really interesting thing to follow of the long term Matt if you're interested.
Ultimately we are looking at rating individual performances, just because a team wins or loses doesn't mean an individual didn't have a good game. Acknowledging our own bias, we think we score the impact of an individual better than any by looking at things that others don't (e.g. ruck involvements, dominant carries, dominant tackles, kick metres etc)
Mad that only 2 of these players were part of winning teams. Does the fantasy scoring need to be updated to reflect performances / difference makers that lead to success?
Think it could be an oddity of this week in particular (think last week 10/15 were on the winning side). But it will be interesting to see how it progresses.
It would be a really interesting thing to follow of the long term Matt if you're interested.
Ultimately we are looking at rating individual performances, just because a team wins or loses doesn't mean an individual didn't have a good game. Acknowledging our own bias, we think we score the impact of an individual better than any by looking at things that others don't (e.g. ruck involvements, dominant carries, dominant tackles, kick metres etc)
Just to follow up, seems like week 3 was majority winners again